LeaderSim

Leadership in action.

See how leaders actually lead.

LeaderSim places leaders in realistic business situations with AI colleagues and asks them to lead the team and develop a strategic plan — then evaluates their behavior and skills in the moment.

LeaderSim simulation: the participant in a live conversation with the AI executive team

What the leader experiences

Step inside LeaderSim.

01

The Business Case

The leader enters a realistic business situation with incomplete information, competing priorities and organizational context.

Incomplete information

Competing priorities

Strategic context

Business materials

LeaderSim participant briefing for the SwiftMart Renewal scenario

Participant briefing · SwiftMart scenario

02

Leading the Team

The leader works with AI colleagues—asking questions, gathering information, navigating disagreement and leading the group.

Asks questions

Gathers information

Responds to disagreement

Tests ideas

Makes decisions

Leads the group

LeaderSim AI colleagues: executive team profile cards

AI colleagues · the executive team

03

The Strategic Plan

The leader synthesizes what they learned and develops a strategic plan.

LeaderSim simulation: the participant drafting a Board memorandum alongside the executive team conversation

Board Memorandum · the leader’s strategic plan

How LeaderSim works

From situation to development, in one continuous simulation.

01

The Business Case

A realistic business situation with incomplete information, competing priorities and organizational context.

02

Leading the Team

The leader works with AI colleagues, asks questions, gathers information, navigates disagreement and leads the group.

03

The Strategic Plan

The leader synthesizes what they learned and develops the required strategic work product.

04

Scoring Capability

LeaderSim evaluates observable behavior and skills across six leadership capabilities.

05

Developmental Report

The leader receives behavioral evidence, capability evaluations, approach interpretation, skills to develop and developmental priorities.

What LeaderSim measures.

LeaderSim evaluates six leadership capabilities through 18 observable leadership skills.

3

Domains

Judgment, Collaboration and Execution.

6

Capabilities

Each one independently evaluated.

18

Leadership skills

Observable evidence beneath the six capabilities.

Judgment

Decision Approach

Thinking Style

Collaboration

Interaction Style

Information Integration

Execution

Goal Orientation

Execution Style

The 18 leadership skills

18 observable skills behind the capability evaluations.

Each capability is evaluated through three observable leadership skills. The skills are the evidence for the capability evaluation. They are not scored separately.

Each capability is evaluated through three observable leadership skills. The skills are the evidence for the capability evaluation. They are not scored separately.

Judgment

Decision Approach

Seeking Relevant Information

Asking Purposeful Questions

Evaluating Evidence

Judgment

Thinking Style

Testing Assumptions

Inviting Challenge

Framing the Issue

Collaboration

Interaction Style

Engaging Relevant Stakeholders

Broadening Participation

Facilitating Group Dialogue

Collaboration

Information Integration

Navigating Disagreement

Synthesizing Perspectives

Building Shared Direction

Execution

Goal Orientation

Assigning Ownership

Setting Accountability Expectations

Defining Deliverables

Execution

Execution Style

Setting Priorities

Sequencing Work

Planning Execution

Behavioral evidence

Measuring leadership in action

LeaderSim does not infer leadership from self-description alone. It evaluates leadership behavior demonstrated during the simulation.

Behavior → Skills → Capability evaluation → Approach → Development

Behavioral evidence · Sample LeaderSim output · from a sample report

“Ray, I’m wondering what the breakdown is by product in our successful stores?”

“Ray, I’m wondering what the breakdown is by product in our successful stores?”

“Ray, I’m wondering what the breakdown is by product in our successful stores?”

Skills

Seeking Relevant Information

Seeking Relevant Information

Asking Purposeful Questions

Asking Purposeful Questions

Capability evaluation

Decision Approach

Approach · Acting ↔ Learning

Learning behavior

Interpretation

That question pointed at the part of the business that was working, which is the most likely place to find the answer to the category problem.

Strength

The information you did request was precisely scoped and correctly addressed, so the analysis that came back was usable rather than generic.

Area of opportunity

With fewer explicit requests for additional evidence observed, the story line you carried into the Board memo was refined by discussion rather than tested against new information before you committed to it.

Area of opportunity

With fewer explicit requests for additional evidence observed, the story line you carried into the Board memo was refined by discussion rather than tested against new information before you committed to it.

Capability approaches

How each capability was expressed.

Each capability is also read along a polarity: two approaches to the same capability. The polarity describes how the capability was expressed. It is not a simple good-or-bad scale.

Each capability is also read along a polarity: two approaches to the same capability. The polarity describes how the capability was expressed. It is not a simple good-or-bad scale.

Capability evaluation

How effectively the behavior was demonstrated.

Approach

How the capability was expressed, read along its polarity.

Range

The ability to flex toward either side as circumstances change.

Judgment

Decision Approach

Acting

Learning

Judgment

Thinking Style

Independent Thinking

Collective Thinking

Collaboration

Interaction Style

Focused Participation

Broad Participation

Collaboration

Information Integration

Leader Synthesis

Team Synthesis

Execution

Goal Orientation

Direction

Accountability

Execution

Execution Style

Flexible Execution

Defined Execution

Shaded band: the balanced zone. The balanced zone represents overall balance. Context determines the right emphasis.

Sample LeaderSim Report

From measurement to development.

Each leader receives a report built entirely from what they did in the simulation. There is no single ideal leadership style.

Sample LeaderSim report: Executive Leadership Summary page
Sample LeaderSim report: Decision Approach strengths, opportunities and behavioral evidence
Sample LeaderSim report: Your Scores on LeaderSim page

6 capability results

Six independently evaluated leadership capabilities. No single overall LeaderSim score.

Polarity scoring

How each capability was expressed, shown along its polarity. The balanced zone represents overall balance. Context determines the right emphasis.

18 skills to develop

The observable leadership skills behind the six capabilities, used to focus development.

Development priorities to extend the leader’s range

Where improving effectiveness will matter most.

Pages shown are from a sample LeaderSim report, for illustration.

Leadership development

Development is range, not correction.

Improve capability performance. Expand leadership range.

Development is not about correcting a leader toward one ideal style. It is about improving effectiveness and increasing the range of approaches a leader can use as circumstances change. Range is the ability to flex toward either side when the situation requires it.

Decision Approach

Acting

Learning

Illustrative · one capability. Open marker: Time 1 approach. Shaded band: range shown at Time 2. The balanced zone represents overall balance. Context determines the right emphasis.

Time 1 → Development → Time 2

Measure development over time.

After development, a new LeaderSim situation shows what has changed in how the leader leads.

After development, a new LeaderSim situation shows what has changed in how the leader leads.

Time 1

LeaderSim

LeaderSim establishes a behavioral baseline:

Six capability evaluations

Approach patterns

Observable skill evidence

Development priorities

Development

Examples

Focused on strengthening capabilities and extending range where it matters.

Coaching

Leadership programs

Practice

Stretch assignments

Leadership experiences

Time 2

LeaderSim

A new LeaderSim situation allows the organization to ask:

1. Did capability performance improve?

2. Is the leader less over-reliant on one approach?

3. Can the leader flex toward what the situation requires?

Each question is answered with the six capability evaluations and the behavioral evidence behind them. No overall score is added.

Uses

Where LeaderSim fits.

Leadership development programs

Leadership development programs

A behavioral baseline at the start of a program, and a clear focus for each leader’s development.

A behavioral baseline at the start of a program, and a clear focus for each leader’s development.

Executive development

Executive development

Evidence of how senior leaders lead through a complex, consequential business situation.

Evidence of how senior leaders lead through a complex, consequential business situation.

High-potential development

High-potential development

See how emerging leaders handle a level of complexity they may not yet have faced.

See how emerging leaders handle a level of complexity they may not yet have faced.

Succession and readiness

Succession and readiness

Behavioral evidence to inform readiness conversations about larger roles.

Behavioral evidence to inform readiness conversations about larger roles.

Measuring program impact

Measuring program impact

Time 1 and Time 2 evaluations show whether capability performance and range changed.

Time 1 and Time 2 evaluations show whether capability performance and range changed.

See your leaders in action.

Run LeaderSim with your leaders and see the evidence for yourself.